Ethics

1 . The five models of normative ethical theories discussed include the following from (Quinn , 2009 , Post , 2004 . In parenthesis , I have listed the exculpation or standard for an action (X ) under the hypothesisdivine command surmise (God said do Xact utilitarianism (X will increase happinessrule utilitarianism (performing acts like X routinely in these circumstances would be expected to keep on the general happinesssocial contract possibility (X will non fail the rights of myself or othersKantianism (X does not treat people as a means to an end , and even if society adjusted to everyone choosing X in this circumstance , X would remain a viable choice2 . The important difference between utilizing social contract scheme and Kantianism for ethical decision-making is that social-contract possibility is concerned with rights , while Kantianism is concerned with debt musical instrument and making sure the decision remains viable for others to shit in the next . In social contract theory , decision-making involves determining what set of rights everyone can have without interfering with authentic rights of greater importance . Thereafter we just have to affiance whether a proposed action would violate any of the existing rights . The hold out is considering ahead of time what rights everyone can have that will not conflict with one another and anticipating any exceptions In Kantianism , we mold out the idea of rights and consider whether our performing the action would reason that potential drop decision off to others in the future . In contemporary language , we might say that Kantianism is sustainable decision-making ReferencesPOST...If you want to relieve oneself a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our pag! e: write my paper