Moral absolutism Essay

When we express of Morality we think of the difference surrounded by right and faulty, the difference between the good and the evil. We use religion to cut our actions and decisions. More often than not, quite a little impose their lessonity on others and expect them to act in the personal manner they retrieve fit. They believe that the idea of right and wrong is normal. In her seek On Morality, Didion contradicts this theory and believes that everyone can have different ideas of virtuous philosophy based on their own perception. To make her point, Didion uses the examples of Klaus Fuchs and Alfred Rosenberg.Fuchs was a British rat who leaked nuclear secrets to the Soviets, and Rosenberg was the Nazi administrator of Eastern Europe, where the Germans committed their most wicked and most murderous acts during World War II. Both of them claimed that what they did were morally appropriate. She thusly goes on to say that Jesus erectifies what he did based on faith. The juxtaposition of these ideas affirms Didions theory that the conviction of morality is vastly based on perspective. This juxtaposition also helps prove that people use morality to justify almost any social function.Osama Bin Laden believed that it was morally right to take the lives of millions of sinless civilians in the name of religion. President Snow, along with the Capitol, in The Hunger Games dictum it fit to throw 24 teenagers in a battlefield and allow them fight until only one remains. Morality does not seem cargon a tool to distinguish right from wrong, but a order to have a clean conscious, irrespective of whether ones acts are good or bad. Didion also says, For better or for worse, we are what we erudite as children. (158) This shows that the ideas we have of good and bad and the so-called morality is take leave of what weve learnt growing up. A cluster of people skill find it slothful to stay with a corpse on a highway. But to Didion, it is the moral thing to do. We do not leave behind our dead. Friedrich Nietzsche said, Fear is the obtain of morality. Didion maintains that morality mightiness differ from person to person. In my opinion, a lot of factors influence the decisions we make and then blame them on morality. The right thing is too abstract to be universal.Didion debates about the cannibalism acts and talks about the undeveloped taboo that no one should eat their own blood kin. This might seem appalling to some while organism a being of others culture. Didion says that morality has the most potentially mendacious meaning. (159) And I couldnt associate more. There is a very thin tilt between right and wrong, and morality is what shows one where to draw it. But the primer of that line is so ambiguous, that people end up using morality to cover up their actions.The idea Didion presents is that humans are not furnish to distinguish between the good and the bad. We think that all actions are fit as long as they dont hurt another person. But then we see people like Adolf Hitler. The man hit millions of people. Yet, he had a bunch of supporters who helped him with these inhumane acts. But he did what he did in the name of morality, in the name of respect for the greater race. The substitution idea of this essay is that morality depends largely on perception. What one finds wrong may not necessarily be seen as inappropriate by another.I followed my own conscience. I did what I thought was right. Didion questions the reader how more madmen have said this and meant it? Didion doesnt believe that these men shelter themselves under(a) the illusion of morality but actually believe their actions are moral and justified. Maybe we ourselves have said it before and been wrong. Our conscience isnt unendingly the best judge of things. But the concept of morality makes it okay to just be impulsive and do what we think is correct in the moment. The relevance of our logic lacks frequency.One might not kill people on a daily basis but one might find it moral to do it someday and go ahead with it. Does this make them flagitious? Is the act of killing immoral? What if the victim is a killer? The answers to questions relating to morality are not black or white. There could be different different instances where individuals might have different stands on issues. All of which they might believe to be morally correct. So the question is, who decides what is moral and what is not? What gives them the power to do so? Should the morality of one person be forced on another?Clearly, universal standards of right and wrong do not exist. The evidence Didion provided as well as instances we see almost the world proves that fact. A lot of people do not agree with Didions idea of differing morality. The people who adhere themselves to a supposedly universal moral code can delude themselves into thinking people who do not follow that code are less humane. People affect to stop fretting over moral ab solutes and let morality run their action and effect every decision they make in order to mark the future is safe from oppression and terrorism.