Pygmalion vs. My Fair Lady Essay

The Academy Award-winning melodious film My graceful gentlewoman produced by George Cukor in 1964, was based on the constitute Pygmalion by George Bernard Shaw written in 1913. Although, the basic story line and underlying themes atomic number 18 the same, there ar a number of differences between the two noted works. The most pronounced difference is that My delightful Lady had songs added to the dialogue. Furthermore, Pygmalion deals with umteen of the companionable issues that were occurring during the Victorian era in England, which is different from the musical which portrays what a person can do if they put forth a true effort.In My Fair Lady there is more emphasis on Elizas character developing her speech and going through all the eccentric exercises such as speaking with marbles in her mouth and existence hooked up to a machine while saying her vowels, than in the written animate. This is probably due to the fact that in the play passel should expect all of this to happen and dont need to be told. Also, Cukors My Fair Lady did this in the musical because it adds entertainment value.When Eliza eventually is able to speak well, Professor Higgins and Colonel Pickering decided to take her to meet Higgins fix to see how see would behave around opposite distinguished pack of high class society. This is the same in both Pygmalion the play and My Fair Lady the musical, however, in the musical they take her to meet Professor Higgins draw at a horse race where as in the play they take Eliza to Higgins lets house. Also, in the play Eliza meets Mrs. Eynsford Hill, Clara, and Freddy at Higgins mothers while in the musical she doesnt meet Clara, barely Mrs. Eynsford Hill and Freddy at the horse race.After Mr. Doolittle is made into a blotto man, which happens in both works, he marries his live-in girlfri terminal. In the play, he visits Mrs. Higgins ahead going to the church to receive married where as in the motion picture he doesnt visit he r at all. The first point in the play when you find out that Mr. Doolittle has become wealthy and is going to get married is when Eliza goes back to the street where she used to live and sees her father plan of attack out of a bar. That is when he informs her that he is getting married the next.At the final test of Elizas improvement, the Ambassadors party, she meets the queen of Transylvania in the musical but she does not in the play. Actually, this entire scene is skipped in Shaws play. The end of the musical is open ended, leaving the readers to come up with their own ideas and feelings approximately what is going to happen next. Maybe Professor Higgins and Eliza Doolittle will live merrily together like the myth that Pygmalion is based on, Pygmalion and Galetea.Although there are many an(prenominal) contrasting events that occur in the musical and in the play they do have many things in common. They have the same characters, although some are developed more in one than in the other. The basic opinion and ideas are the same throughout the musical and play which is expected since My Fair Lady is based on Pygmalion.I enjoyed the musical more than the play because I feel like the musical went into a lot more depth of Elizas transformation. The songs and the actors in My Fair Lady really brought the story to life. For me, Rex Harrisons portrayal of Professor Higgins was absolutely sodding(a) he was able to show more sides of Professor Higgins psyche than you could subsist by reading the play. Pygmalion is the type of play that will never be forgotten, even though My Fair Lady is perhaps the most memorable movie based on Shaws play, there has been many other renditions, such as Pretty Woman, and there will probably many more made in the future.